← index · meeting page · Granicus video · Agenda PDF

Public Safety Committee — 2025-10-20

Decision notes (reviewed)

Written by the reviewer from the ASR + docket; [verbatim-ASR] = quoted machine transcript; [paraphrase] = reviewer's wording, not a quote.

Per agenda item (official Granicus index → ASR evidence)

0:10Approval of the minutes of the September 15, 2025 Public Safety Committee.
Motion type(s) spoken: — · ASR heard “motion passes”
  • 0:15 “public safety meeting. I'll make a motion for that. Do I have a second?”
  • 0:21 “The motion has been made and seconded. Any comments or confusion or disagreement?”
  • 0:29 “None. All in favor? And that motion passes. The next motion I'd like to make is to substitute”
0:34S. ORDINANCE 20-2025 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it receives the affirmative vote of at least five members of Council, or otherwise to take effect and be in force after the earliest period allowed by law, updating various sections of
Motion type(s) spoken: — · ASR heard “motion passes”
  • 0:52 “Second. Is that the one that's on with the agenda? That's the one that I meant I sent to you and Cindy.”
  • 1:10 “Second. All in favor?”
  • 3:03 “left on this one. But I think moving to this version will give us a little more clarity”
  • 1:13 “Aye. Any disagreement? And that motion passes.”
26:28Communication from Fire Chief Fairbanks regarding Fire Engine Purchase.
Motion type(s) spoken: — · no passage phrase heard by ASR
  • 47:41 “And then the second is engine number three, which was delivered in 2024. We ordered that”
  • 57:39 “and file this presentation. Second.”
  • 57:42 “Motion's been made and seconded. All in favor?”

Full ASR transcript

0:00 everybody. I'm going to call the Public Safety Committee to order on October 20th at 634 p.m.
0:10 Our first order of business is to approve the minutes from the September 15, 2025
0:15 public safety meeting. I'll make a motion for that. Do I have a second?
0:21 The motion has been made and seconded. Any comments or confusion or disagreement?
0:29 None. All in favor? And that motion passes. The next motion I'd like to make is to substitute
0:38 the latest TRN version from the law department that was dated 1013 as our new working document.
0:45 That is the one that removes the responsibility of the city for financing this program.
0:52 Second. Is that the one that's on with the agenda? That's the one that I meant I sent to you and Cindy.
0:59 And it's the one in the agenda? That's the one in the agenda, okay.
1:04 So I'd like to make a motion to substitute that version as our working document.
1:10 Second. All in favor?
1:13 Aye. Any disagreement? And that motion passes.
1:18 All right. So I want to look at this document just for a minute. We have some of the members
1:24 from La Swab in the community here with the law department and the animal control officer,
1:29 Mr. Crumley, are here as well. We're getting very close. I feel like we're getting close.
1:35 And I want to say, first of all, thank you to Jennifer and law director Vargo for all your
1:41 work and all your patience with this. We just want to give you a little bit of a
1:46 little bit of time to get this right. We just want to get this right the way that,
1:51 you know, we don't have to go, oh, gosh, we're going to have to go back in six months
1:54 because we missed something here. And I think with the input that we got from
2:01 Dana Pinella at our last La Swab meeting, she gave us some insight into a couple areas
2:07 that we definitely want to look at. Specifically, unsanitary conditions,
2:13 from what I understand, there's still a problem on Davis Court, even though measures have been
2:18 taken there to control the cat population, it's still out of control. So we want to put some
2:26 information together, some verbiage together to make sure that if unsanitary conditions are
2:33 there, that we can do something about it. So that's one of the pieces.
2:37 Some of it was just some simple wording. One of the things that she had requested was
2:44 if the animal control supervisor has to have a dog treated
2:52 to save the life of the dog, then the owner has to pay for that when they come to pick it up.
2:56 So those just kind of detail type things. So we have just a little bit of work to do
3:03 left on this one. But I think moving to this version will give us a little more clarity
3:11 and we'll add a couple more things. Do you all want to say anything from La Swab?
3:16 Go ahead, please come on up.
3:26 Oh, I'm supposed to make you got it. Now it's supposed to stay green, right?
3:30 Okay. I'm Nancy Binder. I am the chair of La Swab. We have a very engaged meeting on TNR.
3:41 It's an issue we have been working for over a year on. Lakewood is a city that's very
3:50 condensed. We have a large population of cats. Found out how well doing a program works with
3:59 resident cats. The problem with outdoor cats is they keep breeding and that's one of the
4:07 reasons for this ordinance. We had a couple of things in the ordinance you gave us that
4:15 we discussed at the meeting, Cindy. I don't know if they have changed out,
4:20 but I'm going to just do a short snippet of that. Go right ahead. Okay. On registration,
4:28 the city wanted it required. You wanted it changed or recommended. Our board would prefer
4:36 not having the registration at all because they feel it would turn away large groups
4:45 and how do you control that. The other thing about registration is we have three ACOs.
4:55 A town of our size for ACOs is having a group of three to five ACOs.
5:06 Tell me what ACO is. Animal control officer. Thank you. I'm sorry.
5:13 They're backed up all the time. Gary runs a really good but tight ship. There's always
5:19 something going on. There's always 30 cats or kittens or hopefully then another waterberry beagle.
5:27 Davis Court, which is what we always use as our example because Davis Court got fed up with their
5:38 feral cats, their community cats. They trapped, they brought them in and by law Gary had to
5:45 dispense with them. There are over 50 cats. You're asking a staff of three to
5:54 do something that only a hard-hearted person could go do and not be affected by.
6:02 Our ACOs are all very kind people. It is not the fun part of their job at all.
6:09 Since TNR is to reduce the population and it does work, you TNR them, put them back in their
6:21 colony. The colony dies off because they're not reproducing and other cats in this way
6:28 don't come in and repopulate the area. Right now Davis Court is getting repopulated because
6:37 a vacuum was made and the cats are just coming in.
6:40 The paperwork is something I think would be and the board thinks would be pretty onerous if we're
6:52 doing large TNRs which is required to really get a whole colony. The funds that you said about
7:04 getting out of the ordinance, it's probably best to have funds out of the ordinance depending
7:09 on how it goes, but there could be grants that could take care of things. The city could fund
7:17 like they did the spay and neuter program as we have this. We have a population that
7:25 over 500 cats of residents couldn't afford to spay or neuter their own cat. They're not
7:32 going to take their funds and spay and neuter a community cat no matter how irritating it is to them.
7:43 I recommend that not in the ordinance but outside the ordinance there's flexibility
7:52 to get it subsidized in some way and flexibility to have
7:58 whoever writes grants for the city help us find grants. We know the typical ones but
8:07 there's always somebody underneath the surface that we would miss.
8:11 If the city does pay through these, one of the advantages is
8:27 that to get the money from the city or the grants, they would have to apply through Gary
8:34 and that would give us a framework of what's being done, where is it being done,
8:40 how's it being done. The training, since there's no official training site that gives you know
8:50 here you've been trained, here's your certificate, that's a hard one on how do you show you're
8:58 trained, how do you get it to Gary that you've been trained. There can be a link from his
9:06 website and just say here you go. It could have a little click on it that you've been there.
9:14 It doesn't have to be official, it doesn't have to be anything, but people do tend to
9:19 think you could trap out and come back in two days, which is not best practices.
9:25 So those are the things LA SWAB had for your consideration and I hope we get this
9:32 ordinance through because it's really going to help the city of Lakewood and the residents,
9:39 especially Davis Court, where it's the area that we need to focus on right now.
9:46 Thank you. Thank you. I did receive some of the language today from Dana Pennella on what
9:52 she thinks could be helpful in this and LA SWAB and I are going to look at this together
9:58 at the next meeting. Cindy, you're going to be off the hook again for the next meeting. I'll
10:02 go to that one too and then we'll work through that and see what pieces we can pull out of that
10:09 for the unsanitary conditions and anything else that we feel like we're missing in there,
10:13 that LA SWAB feels like we're missing in there and then we'll have another version of this
10:19 and we'll look at it again at that time. Do you have any comments or questions? Go ahead.
10:25 Yeah, I wonder. So, you know, I'm following the emails, but obviously we can't consult
10:30 as a committee until we're all here. So I appreciate LA SWAB's work and
10:35 ACO Cromley and Law Department and you and my other colleague on the
10:41 Hope City Committee. I wonder if we can just get, seems like this registration point is
10:47 kind of the one, right, that we're working towards resolution on. So I wonder if it can
10:53 just be explained better so that we as a committee can kind of understand
10:58 where LA SWAB is coming from and then where ACO Cromley is coming from. Would that be helpful?
11:04 Yeah, we had gone around that quite a bit. We had a long conversation about that in the LA
11:09 SWAB meeting and it's my, and you can please speak up if you'd like to. It's my understanding
11:14 that any type of registration or any type of training is just not going to work at all for
11:21 the people that are doing this type of work. Come on up, Megan.
11:34 Hi. Hi. Again, I'm Megan Gallada, the Community Cats Director for CLAWS,
11:39 the Citizens Committee for Lakewoods Animals and Shelter. The one piece that I did want to
11:45 add on to that is that required registration and showing proof of training is the piece that's
11:54 not going to work. We did talk in the meeting about a group such as CLAWS providing training
12:01 for people, just that it should not be required in order to do TNR. So that was just a little
12:08 piece, but the required registration and the requirement to show proof of training
12:15 are the pieces that we want struck. That, from our perspective in representing what Dana
12:21 talked about as well, is that there is no universal or national training program for TNR.
12:32 We do know of a program. It costs money and it's only done once a month,
12:37 so that's going to be a barrier to people. As a community, we and even other TNR groups
12:44 are willing to do training for people, but we just feel strongly that it shouldn't be
12:49 in the ordinance required and registration shouldn't be required because that's going
12:55 to be really onerous for people who are good Samaritans doing this out of the goodness
13:01 of their heart with their own money and their own time to help the cats and ultimately
13:08 help Lakewood and their neighbors. So that's the little piece that we talked about,
13:14 required registration and showing proof of training is the piece that we don't want.
13:22 I believe that the language coming from Dana is going to include something like
13:27 recommended, understanding of recommended best practices, something like that so that people do
13:34 actually know that there are best practices. They're not laws. They change like best practices
13:40 can, but I think that's in the piece that she has sent as well. So thank you so much.
13:46 Thank you. Mr. Vargo, did you want to comment on that or Jen?
13:52 Yeah, so I'll hand it over to Ernie in a minute. A couple of points I wanted to make.
13:56 I believe in July of this year we changed and I'm not sure if this was completely circulated
14:02 to everybody. I know it was circulated to members of this committee that the application
14:07 process would be a one-time annual registration. We can make that available online. We'll work
14:13 with information systems to do that. We would require name, home address, phone number,
14:19 addresses where they plan on trapping and then, you know, an electronic signature.
14:26 We removed the requirement that they show us proof from a property owner that they have
14:32 permission to trap on that property. We understand why that would be problematic.
14:37 That was a requirement that we were thinking of would be protecting the trappers, but if
14:42 you know, they're willing to do that, we're fine with that. And then the only other requirement for
14:53 registration is that at some point you let us know if there's other addresses that are
14:58 being trapped and that can just be a simple email to one of the animal control officers
15:03 so that if they get a question from a resident about something that's going on,
15:08 then they can respond appropriately that, wait, no, this is part of a TNR program.
15:12 They're permitted to be doing this with the permission of the property owner.
15:17 On the training, we also have changed that. We heard that
15:23 complaint early on in the process and changed it from a certificate to training as approved by
15:33 the animal control supervisor so that if somebody says, hey, you know, shows a printout from I went
15:42 to this seminar that if he's comfortable with that, then that's okay. And I believe it was
15:50 Ms. Binder that talked about best practices. If there isn't some sort of training, even if
15:58 it's just a pamphlet that we create that somebody signs off on and says that they've read and
16:03 reviewed, how do we know that folks participating know what the best practices are? You pointed
16:08 to, you know, leaving an animal in a trap for two days, which is not ideal.
16:16 I just feel that we need to have some minimum regulations. We've
16:20 we met with Claus and Leswab probably going on three years ago when they first came to
16:29 us wanting to have a TNR program, sat down with all the groups, came up with our policy
16:34 that was implemented at that time. Obviously, after time, there's things with that policy
16:39 that's not working, which kind of spearheaded this conversation. And, you know, we've had
16:45 multiple conversations in committee. I've met with Council Member Striebig. I attended virtually
16:53 an LSWAB meeting in which I believe Megan offered to help us provide training,
17:00 some sort of a video that we could have people watch, and that would meet our minimum
17:04 qualifications. And I know Ernie had some comments as well.
17:09 Thank you. Thank you, Chairperson. This ordinance that's drafted, the required registration,
17:22 let's just talk about that. I can't emphasize enough that it has nothing to do with anybody
17:29 here. It has nothing to do with C-Claus, Leswab, or good people who are going to do this
17:36 out of the goodness of their heart and in the best interests of the city. It has nothing to do
17:42 with them. If it were just them, we wouldn't have registration. We wouldn't need anything.
17:49 We just had cybersecurity meeting. We wouldn't need that for anybody in this room because
17:54 nobody's going to hack anything. It's for the bad actors. The law department is simply trying
18:00 to protect the city, cat owners, cats, from potential bad actors or perhaps people who are
18:09 careless and negligent, who don't take this practice nearly as seriously as they should
18:14 or like these good people would. So we have a very basic, non-objectively burdensome
18:22 registration. As Ms. Swallow said, name, address, phone number, and where you're going
18:29 to be trapping. Sign and date. Not onerous, objectively. If this deters some bad actor
18:39 or careless actor out there, that's great. That's the intent. If some modest training that
18:46 we're talking about deters the bad actor, the careless actor, that's what we're focused on.
18:53 So we're talking about the bad actors. We're not talking about anybody here. It's certainly
19:01 not Megan when she says it's burdensome. We wouldn't put any burden on these people.
19:07 We're just trying to protect the city from those who might have ill intention. Thank you.
19:15 Thank you. You want to speak again, Megan?
19:25 With all respect to you guys, there was a very long and very detailed meeting
19:32 where Dana Marie Pennella of Holland and Myrden, experts in animal law in the state of Ohio,
19:43 came to speak at the Lessois meeting. She is an expert in this. She also represents
19:50 Alley Cat Allies, the nationally recognized group, if not internationally recognized group for TNR.
19:59 Ms. Striebig put it on to Mr. Crumley and you guys to talk to her because she addressed all
20:09 the reasons that registration is not going to work. You may feel it's not onerous.
20:17 I'm here to tell you it is. And I want you to understand very clearly as someone who has
20:28 been doing TNR in Lakewood for over a decade and has been very actively doing it since January 2024
20:38 that I will not continue to TNR in Lakewood. And my friends are not going to TNR in Lakewood
20:45 if registration is required and if any kind of proof of training is required.
20:51 I gave a very impassioned speech at that meeting. I wish you could have attended it.
20:58 And we had an expert attorney come and speak. She deals with things in Cleveland,
21:06 cases against people with dogs. She deals with all cities. She has helped develop ordinances
21:13 across the state of Ohio. Registration is not going to work. As she explained,
21:20 it will have a chilling effect on TNR in this city. Ask Mr. Crumley how many kittens have come
21:28 into the shelter this year. And that's after I TNR'd all last year, except for a few months
21:34 when I couldn't due to my mom's health condition. And other people are TNRing.
21:40 The weekend before the Leswab meeting, somebody had trapped eight or nine cats.
21:46 They did not tell Mr. Crumley. It's already happening. This bad actors
21:53 does not happen. And as Dana explained, you have other pieces in the legislation
22:00 in the ordinance to deal with it if it does. She provided a whole huge document
22:08 of model language that can be pulled upon. Much of it improves things that
22:15 Lakewood's ordinance doesn't even have now. That doesn't even give Mr. Crumley
22:21 permission to do things he needs to do. I indicated in that meeting,
22:28 and I'm going to indicate to you now, and indicate to this committee,
22:33 I don't want this to be seen as a warning, because that's truly not how I intend it.
22:40 But we have tried and tried and tried, and you just heard the chair of Leswab give her
22:49 recommendations out of that meeting. You just heard her say it. Next time, I will figure
22:57 out what meeting it's going to be, and we will fill this room. We will fill this room
23:03 and we will have the media here. Because we feel that strongly, we need TNR in Lakewood.
23:11 There are cats everywhere. You need people in Lakewood to say, I've got a couple cats.
23:17 I can do this. Or another group, say somebody in Columbus, or a riggy rescue in another city,
23:25 or claws, or lucky paws, another rescue, to say, we can come in and we can do these three
23:32 streets. No one is going to do that if they're being required to register. No one. And I can
23:43 fill this room with people who say that. And trust me, I don't want that to be a threat.
23:50 I'm telling you the reality of what you're looking at doing. We need people to TNR.
23:57 Please, stop micromanaging it. Other cities that don't contribute any money, no staff to TNR,
24:06 they don't have these rules. Find other cities that are doing nothing that have these rules.
24:13 They don't exist. They don't exist. And I know that Dana is ready to speak to you guys
24:22 at length about that. About best practices for municipal ordinances. No other cities require this.
24:31 It's micromanaging something that doesn't need to be micromanaged. We've already offered to do
24:37 training. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate that. Yeah, we did have a lengthy conversation
24:42 about this. And I agreed to look at the recommended language and have LaSueb look at
24:48 this recommended language from Dana Ponella and pull some new verbiage out of that.
24:55 So we'll do that as a next step. And if anybody has any other questions,
25:01 we can pursue that. Or we can table this until the next meeting.
25:08 Yeah, that's fine. I do sense, you know, some consternation. And I,
25:14 um, you know, I think the law department is good at their job. They're trying hard. And you all are
25:23 excellent volunteers. And so I don't, you know, I think you should direct your eye at us.
25:28 You know, not the law department. We're the electeds in this room and we can handle it.
25:31 So that's, that's all I'll say. And we have a duty to figure this out and, you know,
25:36 take your input and take the law department's input and try to come up with a good,
25:39 um, you know, ordinance, but it's on us. So please direct it to us. Thank you.
25:46 You want to add anything?
25:49 No, just that I think that we just need to continue to evaluate this and
25:55 we'll keep working on it because I hear it from both sides. Well, nobody does it this way.
25:59 Nobody does it this way. Somewhere in the middle. We're gonna, we're gonna figure this
26:03 out. And recommended training was something that, um, Megan had agreed to do. And,
26:09 you know, maybe that ends up being a pamphlet too. I don't know what that ends up being.
26:13 And maybe, uh, Liz Swab can start putting together some ideas for what training looks like.
26:21 Okay.
26:26 All right. Good. Okay. With no further questions, um, we're gonna move on to
26:30 our communication from fire chief Fairbanks.
26:44 Chief, the floor is yours.
26:46 Am I on? I'm on. Okay. Thank you. Uh, good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
26:53 The purpose of this presentation is just to inform council, uh, of our upcoming fire engine
27:00 purchase that, uh, I will speak to it a little bit more. It is in our 2028 capital plan.
27:07 I just want to explain how the process goes, um, how we determine what Lakewood needs
27:15 and just how that decision is made at the end of the day.
27:24 So I'll give a little bit of background of how we replace vehicles
27:28 and how that process goes. Our capital planning process, uh, we do have an apparatus committee,
27:34 which is made up of, um, a varied group of folks within the fire department and in the city.
27:42 It includes Captain Joe Colley. He is the chairperson of that committee.
27:46 We also have our three shift mechanics. There's a shift mechanic on each of the, there's A,
27:52 B and C shift. We have a firefighter that's detailed as a mechanic to each of those shifts.
27:58 So they have input. Uh, we also have, um, someone from the EMS side. We have an EMS coordinator
28:04 that provides input mostly on the ambulance purchases, but, uh, he's also a firefighter as
28:11 well. And then we also, um, take into account fleet manager Holman's input as well. Um,
28:19 I'll also go over some quotes that we've gotten and, uh, open up the floor to any questions.
28:24 Good, because I have a couple. I actually, I actually had time to sit down and look at this.
28:29 So I'm looking forward to having this conversation with you.
28:31 Good, good. I knew that you would.
28:33 You know, I, I wanted to know. I wanted to know.
28:37 So this vehicle here, this is engine number four. This is the vehicle that is set to be
28:41 replaced. Uh, we purchased this vehicle in 2005. It was built by the Suffin corporation
28:47 out of Columbus, Ohio. It, uh, it's able to pump 1500 gallons of water per minute.
28:52 It carries its own water supply of 500 gallons. And, um, when this vehicle was purchased,
28:58 just a little background on this vehicle, we were in a different operational model.
29:03 So we had actually two different fire, two separate fire companies at station one on
29:08 Madison. We had a ladder company and an engine company. So this vehicle was set up, uh,
29:13 primarily to just be, um, a pumper truck where it carried hose and water and, uh,
29:20 not as many tools that we needed to carry today. Um, during the pandemic, we wanted,
29:26 we, we kind of saw what was coming, um, that prices were going to increase, that
29:31 supply chain issues were going to happen and that delays were going to come into effect.
29:36 And we decided to put about $30,000 into this vehicle. And what that ended up getting us was
29:44 some upgraded lighting. We replaced the headlights with led lights, some warning
29:49 lights, um, some cosmetic features, uh, such as graphics. Um, but we really wanted to
29:54 primarily focus on the inside of the cab where the firefighters ride. Um, there's been a lot
30:00 of research into cancer prevention in the fire service. And one of the largest contributing
30:06 factors to cancer in the fire service is trapped carcinogens inside the cab of the fire
30:12 engine. So what we ended up doing was we removed almost all of the soft surfaces
30:19 inside the cab that we could, that could trap the carcinogens. The seats were, um,
30:25 one of the biggest ones. So after a fire, the firefighters climb into the vehicle with
30:30 their dirty gear on and the upholstered seats just trap the carcinogens. And every time
30:37 they get up and down out of the seat, it releases them back into the air to where
30:41 they're breathing it in. So what we ended up doing with those seats in that vehicle, um,
30:46 there are, it's almost a vinyl that's impermeable. And when they get dirty,
30:52 we can unzip it, take it off, put a clean one on and throw those in the wash.
30:56 Oh, that's good. That was one of the questions I had.
30:58 Yes, they are, they're, they're a reusable item that we keep. So we have two sets for
31:04 like one for each, two for each seat.
31:07 Very good. The other question I had before you go on is the updates during COVID was that in,
31:12 in 2020? Because I thought I read something that it added 25 years.
31:19 So what we do is we try to keep each fire engine for 25 years. This has been a standard
31:25 practice. It's a industry wide practice. The NFPA recommends that you replace every
31:32 piece of fire apparatus every 25 years. So they recommend that each vehicle spends 15
31:39 years in frontline service and 10 years in reserve service. That way the vehicle is up
31:47 to the standard of the day that the firefighters are riding in. And as long as these vehicles are
31:52 serviceable and safe, then it's okay to keep them. But at 25 years, it's almost a end of
31:58 life time limit. So we did this during COVID to extend it. We didn't know where,
32:07 where the economy was going. We didn't know where society was going. We wanted to
32:12 make sure that we got this vehicle to the 25 years. So that was the intent behind just
32:18 doing some upgrades, making it safer for our firefighters.
32:21 Um, this vehicle would then be disposed of upon delivery of the new vehicle.
32:29 And that new vehicle would end up at station two on our city's west end.
32:33 And when you say disposed of, does that mean that it goes to a volunteer firefighter
32:39 crew somewhere out in the middle of somewhere else?
32:43 It could. We, we have sold a vehicle on, on the used fire apparatus market before.
32:48 Um, you know, we sold it to a department in Kentucky that they couldn't afford something
32:53 brand new. The used fire truck market is, is booming right now. Um, because when I start
33:00 talking about the delays, departments need vehicles now. So they, they purchase a
33:06 used vehicle as almost like a stop gap until that, until that new vehicle shows up.
33:19 So when we built the capital plan, we, um, anticipated a lot of delays. We saw it
33:30 with our previous fire engine purchase. We saw it, we see it with our ambulance
33:34 purchases. Ambulances have a three year wait time from the day you order them.
33:39 Fire apparatus are anywhere from two to five plus years now. So it's very hard
33:45 for municipalities to plan ahead. You know, we just don't know what's going to happen in
33:52 the future. So we have to anticipate those things. Um, currently our capital budget
33:57 request for 2028 is set at 1.5 million for this vehicle. Um, when I initially put this
34:06 number in, I overestimated on purpose and you'll see when we get to the quotes that
34:13 I just barely made it. It was, it was sticker shock for me. Um, it was upsetting for me
34:21 to say the least. Um, I did see that, uh, compared to the last one that we got for 1.1
34:27 million. Exactly. And now it's 1.5 and I'm wondering if by 2028, yeah. Well, so just,
34:36 just for reference, when you, when you sign on the dotted line, you sign the contract,
34:41 that is the price. So that price is 2028's price. Today's price is 2028's price.
34:48 The longer we wait, the more increases are tacked on. Um, there are some clauses in
34:55 contracts that state, um, leave, leave some wiggle room because of tariffs, because of,
35:02 you know, anything, any, there's going to be a bump in the road. There may be something that
35:07 costs a little extra to get next time. So they, they all recommend leave a little wiggle room,
35:14 just so you, you don't have to go back and I don't have to sit here and say,
35:20 I need more, please. After the immense investment that we're about to make.
35:25 There is a controversy. I call it a crisis in the U S fire apparatus industry. So in 2008,
35:32 Wall Street and private equity became involved in the apparatus industry.
35:36 Rev Group was created and they purchased eight different independent manufacturers
35:43 and those included the likes of E1, KME, Ferrara, Spartan, Smeal and Ladder Towers.
35:49 And they consolidated all of those companies into the one Rev Group.
35:54 And currently three manufacturers control 80% of the market share.
35:58 So that, that is one of the items that has really created this dilemma for fire
36:04 departments and municipalities across the nation. Um, the three companies that control
36:10 80% of the market share are Rev Group, Rosenbauer and Pierce. Um, prices have
36:15 since ballooned and delivery times have created unacceptable delays to fire departments
36:19 across the nation. Um, so on September 10th this year, uh, the Senate Homeland Security
36:25 Committee held a hearing with representatives from apparatus manufacturers and American
36:30 fire service leadership and anti-monopoly and antitrust discussion and federal trade
36:35 commission inquiries are underway. Uh, I watched this hearing in its entirety and
36:41 it made me not want to have this meeting because it, knowing that there's fire
36:47 departments out there waiting five plus years for a vehicle that they need yesterday,
36:52 it's, it's pretty troubling. Um, so I mean, there's some root causes to these ballooning
36:59 prices and delays. Uh, the ARPA funding was a big one. We didn't utilize ARPA funding for our,
37:04 our fire apparatus purchases, but many cities did. I know Cleveland was one.
37:10 So all of these orders came in at once and they can only build so many trucks at a time.
37:15 And when the orders just keep coming and keep coming and keep coming,
37:18 the queue gets longer and longer. Uh, supply chain was a big one
37:22 and a shrinking workforce is also one of those.
37:29 All right. So the apparatus committee process, first we sit down and we talk
37:33 about our mission needs. Um, we gather input from the crew that will be getting the vehicle.
37:40 So everyone at fire station number two was asked to come up with a wants and needs list,
37:46 get it to their officer and then submit it to the committee. The committee sits down with
37:52 me and they say, chief, here's, here's what they want. Here's what they need.
37:56 And we kind of go through this list and we determine, okay, here's,
38:00 here's what I need this vehicle to do. I need it to be a needed to pump water.
38:05 I needed to carry different lengths of hose, different sizes of hose. Um, I needed to carry,
38:11 because this is our rescue engine company, I needed to carry extra equipment. So it needs
38:19 to carry the jaws of life, uh, open water rescue equipment, swift water rescue equipment,
38:26 ice rescue equipment, um, high angle, low angle rescue equipment, confined space equipment.
38:33 And I also want to take into account the safety of the firefighters and their health.
38:37 So we need to prevent them from getting cancer as best we can while they're riding inside of the
38:42 vehicle. I want them to be safe when they're traveling. If there's an accident, I want them
38:47 to be able to walk away and come back to work the next shift. And one of our biggest,
38:53 biggest hazards, biggest risks, something that keeps me up at night is them responding to I-90.
38:59 So I'll show you in some of the designs that we received, uh, some ways that we
39:06 can improve their visibility and alert drivers while they're on I-90. Um, we also took into
39:12 account some community initiatives with the climate action plan. We requested an idle reduction
39:18 system on this vehicle. Um, that ranges in price from 15 to $30,000, depending on the
39:27 manufacturer. So, um, I did look into an electric fire truck for Councilman Bullitt.
39:34 The electric fire engine is built by Pierce Manufacturing and Rosenbauer makes one as well.
39:40 The price is double plus the infrastructure. They have to install infrastructure to charge
39:48 the vehicle and that is if our grid can handle it. So, um, while the technology is there,
39:55 I don't feel that Lakewood should be in on the ground level with that.
39:59 I think we should stick with what we know, what works and what is going to be reliable for our
40:05 citizens. Um, so once we gathered the input, determined our mission needs, we contacted
40:12 manufacturers. Um, before you go there, can I ask you just a question about the increased
40:17 visibility on 90 and that's because of distracted drivers or whatever that are
40:22 such a hazardous environment for our firefighters. Um, more firefighters are killed
40:28 or first responders, police involved. Um, more of them are killed on in freeway accidents,
40:36 just working at a scene than anywhere else. So protecting them, increasing our visibility
40:42 while we're there is, is immensely important to me. Um, it's, I guess it would be a
40:50 distracted driver, people driving too, too fast, pass an accident scene. Um, we've had two,
40:56 we had a state trooper and a Cleveland police officer killed in Lakewood on I-90 and we,
41:02 we cover such a small section of that. Um, so I, if I can avoid that
41:08 from here on out, I would retire a happy man.
41:15 And by having this truck, is that just because of the size of it that's going to increase
41:19 the visibility over another truck or? So we, in our design, we requested that
41:28 a light bar be placed across the top of the vehicle in the back and I'll show in the designs.
41:34 It can be used for like a scene light where it's just pure light coming out to light up the
41:42 dark or it can be used as like a traffic arrow. Got it. Okay. With like yellow amber
41:48 lights, warning drivers, they can see it very bright, big red truck.
41:55 Hopefully you can't miss it. Hopefully. Yep. Thank you. I appreciate that.
42:00 So the manufacturers we contacted, uh, were Pierce, um, because of the electric option.
42:07 We contacted Sutfin and we also contacted Seagrave. Um, we do have,
42:13 I'll get to each one, but I'll explain why each one was contacted when I get to their slides.
42:23 They come up with the design. We, we go, we give them, here's our list.
42:28 They come up with the design. They send it to us. They give us a drawing. We're like,
42:32 yeah, take this off. We don't like this. Add this. It's a back and forth process. It takes
42:38 months. Um, we're consistently reviewing these and then going over seeing, okay, well,
42:45 we need to fit this piece of equipment in this compartment. This compartment is
42:49 not big enough. What, what can you do for us? And they, they send it to their engineers and
42:55 they, they send it back to us for review. One of the first quotes we got was from Pierce
43:06 Manufacturing. They've been in the business for quite a while. They're a subsidiary of Oshkosh
43:11 and they're located in Wisconsin. They have a local service center in Macedonia.
43:16 We currently have one Pierce fire engine. We purchased that vehicle during the pandemic to
43:22 replace an aging out heavy rescue vehicle. We purchased it used from a department in Texas,
43:29 no road salt in Texas. So the underside, the meat and potatoes of this vehicle were sound.
43:36 Um, we purchased that vehicle for $285,000 and we received a trade in of 35,000 on the former heavy
43:46 rescue. Um, this vehicle is due for refurbishment so we can extend that usable life so it can
43:53 continue to serve us in Lakewood. And what year is that truck? That is a 2010. So by,
44:02 by refer, there's two levels of refurbishment. There's a level one and a level two.
44:09 The level that we were going to go to with this vehicle would essentially reset the clock.
44:14 Oh, okay.
44:20 So here is our design from Pierce. Um, so as you can see along the top of the back of the
44:30 truck up, up here, you can see these little, these dots along the top. Yeah. So that is the,
44:39 that is the light. It can, it'll either be a floodlight or an arrow. So we can turn that on
44:47 and warn drivers that are coming towards us. Or if we're on a side street and it's in the
44:52 middle of the night, we can just turn the floodlight on and we've lit, we've lit up the
44:55 whole scene. Um, when we sent out our request to the manufacturers, we asked, we wanted to compare
45:03 apples to apples or, you know, Macintosh to pink ladies. So we asked for the same size motor,
45:11 the same transmission, the same size pump, the same size water tank,
45:15 the same amount of seats in the cab for the firefighters, the same ground ladders,
45:20 the same amount of hose that we're to carry. So we wanted everything to be as similar as possible
45:27 so we could gauge an accurate, just get us an accurate number and really do the apples
45:34 to apples comparison. Um, one thing that we requested of all of our manufacturers was to
45:40 have a stainless steel body. We've noticed that over the years, um, the bodies on the
45:46 fire engines start to corrode and the paint peels, then we have problems with the undercarriage,
45:52 the frame. So we wanted to protect the vehicle so we could get the maximum life out of them.
45:58 We understand that this is an enormous investment for our citizens and we want this truck to be
46:03 able to be around for the 25 years so we get our, our money's worth out of it.
46:09 Um, this vehicle, the price that we received from Pierce was 1,437,620.
46:18 Unfortunately, the build time is a 48 to 51 month build time, which does not work on our timeline.
46:27 Included in this price would be two trips to Wisconsin for the apparatus committee to do
46:32 a pre-construction meeting and an acceptance inspection at the end. So we would, we would
46:37 only be able to go up, we, we would only be able to go up there, um, in the beginning,
46:43 when they, before they start building it and when it's finally all done.
46:50 Our next manufacturer was Sutfin. They've been around since 1890. They are a family-owned
46:56 company. They have five generations of Sutfin's working in the plant and the company.
47:02 It's located in Columbus, Ohio. They have local service available. They have a mobile technician
47:08 that shows up at our fire stations. We give them a call. We say, hey, this isn't working or
47:14 something is broken. They are, they come to us. We don't have to send the truck anywhere
47:19 and unless it's a major component, it can be fixed here in Lakewood and it's back on the
47:24 road and in a short amount of time. If it's a major component issue, they can drive it down
47:31 to Columbus and fix it in the factory.
47:36 We currently have two Sutfin apparatus. Uh, engine number four is one of them.
47:41 And then the second is engine number three, which was delivered in 2024. We ordered that
47:47 in 2022. It's at station number three on Clifton Boulevard and it is a quint apparatus,
47:53 which means it, it pumps water, carries water, carries hose, carries ground ladders and
47:59 is equipped with an aerial ladder. And, uh, like you mentioned, it was purchased for 1.1 million.
48:08 Here's the design we received from Sutfin. Um,
48:14 see if I can show up at the top, this grid up here is that light
48:20 that we talked about. Um, we also added, uh, some compartment space.
48:28 We want, we want to take all the tools out of the cab, all of the,
48:34 all of our brake stuff tools. Um, if they were ever involved in an accident,
48:38 I don't want flying projectiles going through the cab at my firefighters. Um, it'll also
48:45 help keep the cab cleaner. Uh, so they would just step out of the vehicle,
48:49 open up one of those compartments and their tools would be right inside,
48:52 right outside their door. Uh, we also wanted to consider the fact that we are an all hazards
49:00 department. The fire service is ever changing. Tomorrow we could be required to, to handle
49:05 some other type of emergency or, or hazard that comes down the road and mitigate those
49:11 risks. So when we designed this vehicle, we wanted to leave, we wanted to be able to store
49:16 everything that the current vehicle already does and leave about 20% room for growth.
49:22 This is a 25 year vehicle. We want it to be able to serve us well into the future.
49:31 Price for this vehicle was $1,460,860. Uh, build time is 28 to 30 months.
49:39 Uh, there are unlimited trips to the factory for pre-construction acceptance testing and
49:44 mid-build inspections. We just have to phone ahead and that would be it. So the, uh,
49:50 idle reduction system is $32,300 on this. Essentially what they do is they insert,
49:59 uh, two lithium ion batteries. So if the vehicle is sitting on a side street and
50:06 it's not operating as in like, it's not pumping water, the vehicle will turn the motor off and
50:13 run off the battery. So there's no emissions. And once, once the battery level got to a certain
50:20 point, the engine would kick back on to recharge the batteries.
50:23 And is that cost included in that 1.46? Yes, it is.
50:26 Okay. Thank you.
50:27 Yeah. Our last manufacturer that we reached out to was Seagrave. Seagrave has been around
50:38 even longer, 1881. They're family owned. They're also in Wisconsin, but their service center is
50:44 located in Kentucky. Uh, they don't have a huge presence here in Northeast Ohio. Uh, they
50:50 are the, the premier builder of fire trucks for New York City. Uh, if, if New York City
50:57 swears by them, I'm going to take their word for it. Um, they've built so many vehicles for
51:03 them. I, they've been using them for over 30 years. Uh, we have never owned a Seagrave
51:09 fire apparatus and Cleveland Heights is the only one in Northeast Ohio that we know of.
51:15 They do have an excellent reputation for building durable and high quality fire engines.
51:19 Um, we made contact with them numerous times. Um, I don't know if we're just small potatoes to them,
51:30 but, uh, it took them until this morning to get me a quote and we started reaching out
51:36 at the end of April. So we gave them the exact same specifications, say the same
51:43 requirements. And that quote came in at, uh, 1.35 to 1.45 million. So it's right in, right in
51:52 where everyone else is falling in line. Uh, they have a 50 month build time. So again,
51:58 not great. It doesn't meet our timeline. Uh, and I'm still, so the process that we've
52:04 already done with the other two manufacturers of the back and forth, the tweaking of,
52:08 of the design still has to happen. Um, I was, I was a little bit disappointed that they,
52:15 they couldn't come through for us in a more timely fashion knowing the great reputation
52:21 that they have. So that is essentially the process and, and how we are, you know,
52:33 trying to make this decision. Um, I guess at this point, any questions, any concerns?
52:42 Colleagues.
52:46 Yeah, thank you, chair. And thank you, chief, um, for the thorough presentation. Um,
52:51 you know, obviously council is going to do what we, um, need to do to support,
52:56 uh, the men and women in the fire service. Uh, from a process standpoint, this might be a
53:03 director Mahoney question, but you know, you lay it out 2028 is the capital plan year.
53:08 I do remember with, I think the one we got in 2024, it required like a sizable down payment.
53:14 So I like, what does council approval look like in this sense? Is it like we approve
53:18 a capital plan and we, these are estimates you're giving us. You're trying to stay in
53:22 front of it so that, you know, when we see it in the budget, it's not a surprise.
53:26 Is that kind of the intention here? Yes, it is. Uh, previous with the previous vehicle,
53:31 that vehicle came out of turn. We were in a situation where, uh, the truck that it replaced
53:38 was failing. Uh, it needed a lot of work. It was out of service for a year. Uh, that's
53:44 another issue that we have is getting parts for older vehicles and the downtime is really
53:50 what grinds us to a halt. Um, we, we need to be ready 24 seven. When, when I have a
53:57 vehicle that goes out of service, I need something to take its place instantly.
54:01 I need no interruptions in our service to the community. So keeping on top of our capital
54:06 purchases helps us with that. And when we have to drag things out, um, and, and
54:12 source parts, getting service, getting reliable service and quick service from,
54:18 from these manufacturers is probably our top priority. Uh, we have a couple of vehicles
54:25 now that we need parts. We can't get anybody on the phone. We need to use a portal.
54:31 We need to do this. And then the parts show up and it's not the right part.
54:34 And it's weeks and weeks and weeks that this vehicle is sitting idle, that we can't
54:38 use it. So, um, essentially that, that the vehicle we purchased previously needed
54:46 council approval to earmark that money outside of the capital budget at that time,
54:52 just so we could place the order, get it going. Um, I don't believe that this,
54:59 because it's not out of turn, because it's already in the capital plan.
55:03 I don't believe that there's going to be much that's going to be needed
55:06 for that. I just wanted to be here to present this. So everyone is aware that,
55:12 Hey, this is coming. This is, this is how we do it. Um, once the order is placed,
55:18 the payment. So it was a little different for Pierce and Sutfin payment is due on
55:25 delivery. There are prepayment discounts. If we as a city decide let's pay for it up front,
55:32 we can save 5%. Um, Seagrave a little bit different. They want five installments.
55:37 They want 25% to get started. 25% once the chassis built, 25%, 20% and then 5% when it
55:46 shows up in Lakewood. Um, so that, that's an option as well. Um, I just, Director Mahoney
55:54 would have to be the one to make that call. So I leave the, I leave the numbers up to her
56:00 as far as, I mean, I'm just here to tell you what fire truck we want. Um, so yeah.
56:09 Thank you. And I think what we can all agree on is that private equity ruins everything.
56:13 And it's, it's interesting that they realize the market that they can get 80% of the share of,
56:18 and then just chop it for pieces. And then, cause I, you know, but part of that is
56:22 they're smart enough to know that if they make it hard for you to get parts,
56:26 then it makes you want to get a new truck. Yeah. Planned obsolescence.
56:29 Yes. Um, so that's interesting, but I, I, you know, uh, I thank you for the thorough
56:34 presentation. I think you kind of went through, um, the current truck and you know,
56:39 it's been refurbished a little, but, um, you know, it's all about having a plan and not letting the
56:45 plan work you. And so I appreciate your kind of thoughtfulness and bringing it in front of us
56:49 early so that there's no surprises. Um, that's all I have. Thank you.
56:54 Okay. Thank you. Any other questions? Councilman, Councilwoman Merckx.
56:58 Thank you. This isn't a question. It's a comment. Thanks for the thorough explanation.
57:03 I mean, I, I, I'm all in favor of you having the equipment that you need to do your job
57:08 because you guys work hard and really, um, take care of us in the city. So thank you for explaining
57:14 this and, um, can't imagine stainless steel undercarriage. Got to add to the expense,
57:20 but I'm sure in the long run, it cuts down on a lot of the maintenance,
57:24 but thank you for the thorough explanation. Thank you.
57:28 Thank you, chief. I appreciate, um, all your work on this and,
57:32 and keeping us up to date and answering all my questions. Thank you.
57:35 Without any further questions, uh, from the committee, I will make a motion to receive
57:39 and file this presentation. Second.
57:42 Motion's been made and seconded. All in favor?
57:45 Aye. And without, uh, further comment or business, this meeting is adjourned.